Expert Dr Jean Graille addresses the issue of incorrect 
information dissemination about palm oil, highlighted recently by 
statements attributed to three Belgian senators and Swiss MP Dominique 
de Buman. 
THE poor understanding of fats and oils in France,
 and Europe more generally, and the unfair demonisation of palm oil, has
 had quite a few repercussions on the product.
Dr Jean Graille, a
 scientific expert on biotechnology with a focus on fats and lipids, is a
 renowned authority on fats and oils, and in an interview with The Oil Palm, he addresses the more common fallacies about palm oil.
 In your opinion, do the French have an adequate understanding of oils and fats?
Absolutely
 not! Like all global consumers, the French do not have a good 
understanding of foods that are commercially available to them, and fats
 and oils are no exception.
Two statements that have often been made to illustrate this point:
“Butter contains more fat than sunflower or canola oil.”
 – This is not true. Butter contains 20% water. It is a “water-in-oil” 
emulsion containing 80% fat, whereas sunflower and canola oils contain 
100% fat.
“Olive oil contains more fat than hazelnut oil.” – Wrong again. Both consist of 100% fat.
However,
 it is interesting to note that both beliefs come from sensory 
perceptions and have to do with the appearance of these products and how
 they feel in our mouths. Beliefs based on sensory perceptions have 
nothing to do with scientific evidence.
The following two beliefs are also not backed by scientific evidence and lead us toward misinformation:
> Palm oil is responsible for cancers and cardiovascular diseases because it contains a lot of saturated fat. 
> Palm kernel oil is also responsible for this type of disease.
Unfortunately,
 consumers assimilate this information, and although few of them read 
the labels on food items on the shelves, these types of claims grow to 
unfairly demonise an entire segment of the agro-food industry. The idea that something may damage your health is a powerful factor in the spread of false information. 
Two
 Belgian Senators, Sabine de Bethune and Cindy Frassen, have proposed to
 limit the content of palm oil in food products to 2g per 100g. They 
have argued that using palm oil is as dangerous as using trans fats. Is 
there any evidence for this claim? What negative effects could there be 
from the Senators’ proposal to limit palm oil?
  There is no 
scientific evidence that support the Senators’ comments. However, there 
is plenty of research and global scientific literature that demonstrates
 that the regular consumption of trans fatty acids is dangerous.
  Scientific
 studies all lead to the same conclusion, the consumption of trans fats 
induces cardiovascular disease and cancer, particularly breast cancer.
  Conversely,
 palm oil is completely free of trans fats. Palm oil contains a balance 
of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids and its consumption is not 
linked to any forms of cancer.
  When the Senators proposed to 
limit the content of palm oil to 2%, they were undoubtedly confused with
 the decision by several EU Member States to limit the content of trans 
fats in fats and oils; in fact, Denmark has set this limit to 2%.
  Note
 that palm oil is a natural product that does not cause health problems 
given its unique chemical structure. While containing a balance of 
saturated and unsaturated fats, the unique structure of the saturated 
fatty acids in palm oil considerably limits their assimilation by our 
digestive systems.
   In fact, the saturated fats in palm oil are 
only assimilated at 66-70%, whereas those in sunflower or rapeseed oils 
are assimilated at 95%; palm oil therefore contains fewer calories. Furthermore,
 palm oil contains vitamin E, and is the most significant source of 
tocotrienols, which offer protection against cancer, and provitamin A. 
  Finally,
 do not forget that we need saturated fats as our cell membranes must be
 very fluid in order to allow waste to exit and nutrients to enter our 
cells. Mother Nature designed the lipid composition of cell membranes to
 include a precise and smart ratio between saturated, monounsaturated 
and polyunsaturated fats. These simple reminders show how sorely 
mistaken these two Senators are in tabling such proposals and engaging 
in scare-mongering.  
Another Belgian senator Muriel Targnion 
recently stated that the consumption of palm oil increases the risk of 
breast cancer. Is this true?
Absolutely not! Senator Targnion
 makes an erroneous statement when citing the joint report by the 
Institut national de la Santé et de la Recherche médicale (Inserm) and 
the Institut Gustave Roussy.
  The joint report published by these 
two research bodies finds that trans-oleic acid and trans-palmitoleic 
acid are suspected of causing cancer – especially breast and colorectal 
cancers – but Senator Targnion erroneously claims that these fatty acids
 are found in palm oil.
  This is completely false! Like all common
 vegetable oils, palm oil does not contain these trans fatty acids and 
it is in fact completely free of all trans fats. Only partially 
hydrogenated (i.e. processed) soy and canola oils contain trans fats in 
significant amounts.
  It should be pointed out that the trans 
fatty acids referred to by Senator Targnion are found in products of 
ruminant origin, in particular in dairy products such as butter, creams,
 and cheeses, as well as in the fat found in meat.
  These trans 
fatty acids are a result of natural hydrogenation caused by the 
anaerobic microbial flora inside the stomach of ruminants.What 
Senator Targnion should have pointed out was that palm oil is the only 
oil that contains tocotrienols, which are believed to offer strong 
protection against cancers, especially breast cancer. 
  Many 
medical research studies have been performed on tocotrienols from palm 
oil and all have demonstrated good protection against cancers, including
 breast cancer.
  Some studies have even shown a clear association between palm oil consumption and cancer remission.
Swiss
 MP Dominique de Buman claims that rapeseed oil produced in Switzerland 
is healthier than palm oil. Is this true? MP de Buman believes that 
rapeseed oil and butter could easily replace palm oil in food products 
in Switzerland. What are the benefits of using palm oil, and what are 
the potential risks for Swiss consumers of replacing palm oil in their 
food?
  Swiss MP Dominique de Buman’s statement is not 
scientifically acceptable. The best option for consumers is to make use 
of a range oils and fats to ensure a balanced intake of saturated fats 
as well as omega-9, omega-6 and omega-3 fats.
  In fact, all fats 
are not equal and all have their advantages and disadvantages. Rapeseed 
oil contains all types of fatty acids, and in particular, linolenic acid
 (omega 3), which is also found in soy and oils derived from nuts.
  However,
 this makes it sensitive to oxidation and heat. This is why scientists 
advise to consume this oil fresh because the combination of oxidative 
and thermal effects generate unnatural toxic molecules.
  This is 
also why it is recommended to use a far more stable oil, like palm oil, 
for frying and to prolong the shelf life of foods.
  Palm oil also 
has numerous other qualities. It is a “naturally hydrogenated” oil that 
is free of trans fatty acids and is also GMO-free. In addition, palm 
oil’s unique physical properties make it very attractive for a wide 
range of food applications to accentuate the taste and texture of foods.
  The
 preparation of margarines containing suitable quantities of sunflower, 
rapeseed and palm are a perfect example of products that offer a 
balanced intake of the four types of natural fatty acids.
  Regarding
 MP de Buman’s comments on butter, on the nutritional level, butter 
contains many short fatty acids that are quickly metabolised to make 
energy, but also very long chain fatty acids that have been found to 
cause cardiovascular problems.
  The complete replacement of palm 
oil in food products is unwelcome because it will change the taste of 
foods and it will also lead to Swiss consumers consuming more dangerous 
trans fats.
  It seems that while MP de Buman wants to stop using 
certain types of imported products in order to further promote its 
rapeseed and dairy industries, he has not fully considered the 
implications of his erroneous statement on the health of Swiss 
consumers.
In light of the remarks made by Belgian Senators 
de Bethune, Frassen and Targnion and Swiss MP de Buman, do you think 
that certain people may be guilty of making alarmist claims regarding 
palm oil?
  Unfortunately, yes. Certain people have taken 
advantage of their own position to make alarmist claims while certain 
members of the anti-palm lobby have an interest in denigrating the image
 of palm oil so that other vegetable oils or dairy fats may benefit.
  However,
 this is a dangerous game and may ultimately result in more damage to 
competing vegetable oils, if a malicious campaign were to be launched 
against these oils evoking the dangers of GMOs and their inferior yields
 resulting in the need to deforest 10 times more land to produce 
comparable amounts.
  Specifically, soy has resulted in the loss of 10 times more biodiversity in the Amazon than the cultivation of oil palm trees.
 What are trans fatty acids? How do they relate to palm oil?
   Let
 us start by reiterating that palm oil does not contain trans fats. 
Trans fatty acids in their natural state can be found in the fats of 
ruminants and therefore in milk and dairy products, butter, cream, 
cheeses, etc. However, they are present in small amounts. They are 
formed through the partial hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids in 
the rumen of cattle by the microbial flora inside this organ.
  Trans
 fatty acids are also found in partially hydrogenated oils – but in 
significant amounts. Thanks to the use of naturally hydrogenated oils 
like palm oil – which is entirely trans fat free – we have been able to 
develop a wide range of margarines and spreads and cooking fats that do 
not contain hydrogenated oils. Regarding the myths surrounding palm 
oil, what are the key points that French consumers need to remember 
about palm oil and its effects on health? 
  Consumers need to 
remember that scientific researchers consider refined palm oil as having
 a neutral or positive effect on health; it has a balanced fatty acids 
content, it contains a small amount of compounds such as carotenes, 
tocopherols and above all tocotrienols that have a powerful protective 
effect against cancers and cardiovascular diseases.
  Palm oil is a
 valuable ingredient for the European food industry because it enables 
an enormous range of manufacturing processes at a lower cost and at no 
health risk to the consumer. Consumers should also remember that the 
assimilation rate of palm oil is 65% to 70% and that its saturated fatty
 acids are not dangerous because they are excreted in the form of 
calcium salts thanks to its favourable structure.
In your 
scientific paper, reference is made to anti-palm oil lobbies and the 
farcicality of the current debate. What is your opinion on the 
demonisation of palm oil by certain players in the retail sector? 
   Palm
 oil has been targeted unfairly in a campaign in Europe to demonise it, 
primarily through the activities of anti-palm oil lobbies that can be 
clearly identified, namely sunflower and canola for Europe.
   In 
fact, palm oil is the most popular vegetable oil in the world, with 
global production in 2012 reaching 51 million tons (MT) compared to 41 
MT for soy, followed by canola at 23 MT and sunflower at 14 MT. This 
supremacy in the global vegetable oil market has not pleased producers 
of competing vegetable oils.
   Anti-palm oil lobbies know that it 
is very easy to make false claims on a certain topic and target these 
claims at uninformed consumers who quickly assimilate them to become 
accepted beliefs. Once they have been disseminated, these claims can 
only be countered and eradicated by a laborious process of education 
centred on the promotion of scientific facts.
   Communication 
professionals know very well how this works, and in an age where correct
 and false information can circulate globally in real-time thanks to the
 Internet, television, and newspapers, it has become extremely easy to 
reach out and cause alarm among a great number of consumers by providing
 them with “information” on a particular subject.
   This is 
particularly effective when a supposed health-risk is emphasised and 
associated with the consumption of a particular product.
   In the 
case of the anti-palm oil lobbies, their misinformation activities 
reached their apex when major television channels decided to address a 
topic like “the effect of palm oil on human health and the environment” 
and provided a platform for doctors who are self-professed 
“nutritionists” or environmentalists who try to educate us on “healthy 
living” or how to be responsible citizens. In France, the success
 of such communication or misinformation campaigns did not go unnoticed 
by players in the retail sector who ultimately distribute products 
containing palm oil. 
   Given the significant financial interests at
 stake, they saw the attacks on palm oil as an opportunity to promote 
their own range of “palm oil-free” products.
   Under the pretext of
 consumer health, which remains paramount, certain brands took “social 
action” by declaring that they would no longer offer any products 
containing palm oil to their customers.
   In doing so, the brands 
believed that they had regained their credibility and increased their 
influence on customers through cheap, opportunistic advertising. France
 is famous for having banned GMO agriculture from its territory. Do you 
think that most French consumers know that palm oil does not contain 
GMOs?
  Palm oil actually has the advantage of not containing 
GMOs. The oil palm has been improved through traditional breeding 
selection techniques.
  In South-East Asia, the palm species Elaeis guineensis
 originally from West Africa, has been successfully cultivated. There 
are extremely high yields per hectare, often exceeding four tons per 
hectare in certain areas. To this day, palm oil has never been produced 
from transgenic crops. On the other hand, soy, canola and corn oil from 
both the North and South American continents likely come from transgenic
 crops.
Why do food producers like palm oil so much?
  Palm
 oil is a key ingredient for many food producers because it has many 
desirable qualities. For instance, it is used to give certain foods a 
specific texture and consistency.
  In addition, palm oil is 
popular because it not only requires limited processing, it stands up 
well against the thermal and oxidative stress that is encountered during
 cooking and frying, due to the fact that it contains few 
polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are very sensitive to heat and 
oxygen.
  Finally, palm oil gives foods a longer shelf life as its 
tocopherols (vitamin E) and tocotrienols (vitamin E analogs) protect 
against thermo-oxidative degradation.
Why do food manufacturers prefer palm oil and its derivatives to hydrogenated oils (soy and canola)?
  Producing
 goods with palm oil or its derivatives results in products that are 
more stable without any off-flavours or unpleasant odours when cooking 
or reheating, which is not at all the case when shortenings manufactured
 from liquid oils are used.
  In essence, industrial manufacturers 
prefer palm oil and its derivatives because they provide a broader range
 of applications at a lower cost – for instance, very specialised 
stearins are obtained through fractionation of palm oil.
  For 
example, cocoa butter equivalents (CBE) are produced with thermoplastic 
characteristics identical to cocoa butter. CBEs costs five to 10 times 
less than cocoa butter and are very important from a technical point of 
view.
  The European Union has authorised the use of CBE in cocoa 
butter by up to 5% maximum. Excellent 100% CBE chocolate can be found in
 Malaysia, which is not surprising because the cocoa is what gives the 
flavours, not the fat, which only provides the “melt in the mouth” 
sensation due to the properties of cocoa butter or CBEs.
 What do food manufacturers and retailers need to do in order to prevent the spread of misinformation on fats and oils?
   Unfortunately,
 the spread of incorrect information and misinformation is a serious 
problem. While it is true that it is more complicated to provide 
information on a formulated food that contains 10 to 20 different 
ingredients than on a basic product, producers can counter the spread of
 misinformation by providing scientifically accurate information on 
their labels.
 > Dr Jean Graille completed his studies at 
the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Marseille (National Chemical
 Engineering Institute of Marseilles). He began working as a researcher 
at the Institut des Corps Gras (Institute for Fats and Oils) before 
continuing his extensive scientific career in the Agribusiness Program 
of CIRAD where he managed the team for “Food and Non-Food Substances - 
Lipid Technology Sciences”. Dr Graille won the Chevreul medal in 1997 
and went on to receive the Kaufmann prize in 1999. He is a renowned 
authority on fats and oils in France, Europe, and around the world. If you would like to know more about palm oil or receive more information, contact info@theoilpalm.org.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment